The artists describe what they are doing by referring to the techniques they use to make their trees. I noticed it is a combination of little tweaks and additions that all add up to create a specific style for each of the artists. They direct our attention to why they are doing something--why the paint is mixing on the page, why lighter fluid is being mixed with the paint, why they are starting with a basic black silhouette.
Each artist had their own style when creating trees. Bob Ross used very basic designs that added together to create a detailed picture. He used a series of brush strokes to create a forest of "happy little trees." The disney painters also had their own styles that resulted in very different outcomes of the same subject based on their interpretation. One painter's tree came out to be abstract because he saw the tree as a structural being with less detail and more bold outlines and edges. Another saw the tree as full of life and alive, so he gave it movement by mixing the paint on the page and using pallet knifes instead of brushes to give it a wispy willowing look. Another went for three dimensions using shadows and outlines and the last used realism, focusing in on the details of the bark.
My rough draft was really rough because I couldn't figure out how to say what I wanted to say, so basically I had trouble putting my thoughts onto the paper. It was frustrating because when I wrote them down, my organized thoughts that sounded so good in my head no longer sounded so good. Pretty happy with my final draft since I cleaned things up a bit and made things more clear.
The question of “what does this mean” helped because they reminded me I had to go back and define terms that I knew but the reader might not necessarily know. Also, the question of “how does this relate to exigence” reminded me to relate my evidence back to my original claim.
I like your focus on the why for the artists! I liked how you noted the desire for each artist, bringing up that the tree came out abstract because of how they saw the tree. The differences between the artists views and paintings was easy to follow in your reflection and it honed in on the style of each artist well.
ReplyDeleteI also really like how you focused on the why's of the artists and how you talked about the perspectives of the artists influenced the works that they were doing. It reminds me of how the different disciplines might have different ways of approaching the same topic.
ReplyDeleteHi! I really like how you described the moves that the different artists use. I think it would strengthen your paper to include more analysis about the moves though. You did a good job of comparing them, but I think your post would benefit if you included the effects that these different moves have on the viewer and on the art itself.
ReplyDeleteHi! I really like how you described the moves that the different artists use. I think it would strengthen your paper to include more analysis about the moves though. You did a good job of comparing them, but I think your post would benefit if you included the effects that these different moves have on the viewer and on the art itself.
ReplyDelete